somaye Hamidi; Zeynab Ghasemi
Volume 4, Issue 7 , July 2014, , Pages 61-78
Abstract
With the formation of the developments in Syria, each of the regional and trans-regional neutral stance towards this country have taken some of the actors involved in the country’s ...
Read More
With the formation of the developments in Syria, each of the regional and trans-regional neutral stance towards this country have taken some of the actors involved in the country’s civil war and the rise of ISIS. In this study, we seek to find answers to this question will be central strategy cause regional security crisis in Syria? However, given the extent of the actors only security strategy, Turkey, Israel and Iran are the most influential role in the region, will be discussed. The findings of this study suggest that Turkey’s security strategy toward Syria is variable and complex. Turkey’s policy of mediation and arbitration to provide multiple rotations and management facilities opposition to war and the threat of war is tilted. Israeli security strategy with regard to the support of America unquestioned existence of their interests in the Golan highlands and the expansion of Iranian influence in the region. In this context, Turkey has been associated with Iran’s security strategy can be maintained in the end the Assad government in the context of explaining the balance of threat against Israel.
